Which is the Best Way to Perform the Physiological Cost Index in Active Individuals With Unilateral Trans-Tibial Amputation?

S Brunelli; A Sancesario; M Iosa; A S Delussu; N Gentileschi; C Bonanni; C Foti; M Traballesi

doi:10.33137/cpoj.v2i1.32953

Which is the Best Way to Perform the Physiological Cost Index in Active Individuals With Unilateral Trans-Tibial Amputation?

Can Prosthet Orthot J. 2019 Dec 14;2(1):32953. doi: 10.33137/cpoj.v2i1.32953. eCollection 2019.

Authors

S Brunelli¹, A Sancesario², M Iosa¹, A S Delussu¹, N Gentileschi², C Bonanni², C Foti², M Traballesi¹

Affiliations

¹ Fondazione Santa Lucia, Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Health Care, Rome, Italy.
² Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Abstract

Background: Physiological Cost Index (PCI) is a simple method used to estimate energy expenditure during walking. It is based on a ratio between heart rate and self-selected walking speed. Previous studies reported that PCI is reliable in individuals with lower limb amputation but only if there is an important walking impairment. No previous studies have investigated the correlation of PCI with the Energy Cost Walking (ECW) in active individuals with traumatic unilateral trans-tibial amputation, considering that this particular category of amputees has an ECW quite similar to healthy individual without lower limb amputation. Moreover, it is important to determine if PCI is also correlated to ECW in the treadmill test so as to have an alternative to over-ground test.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between PCI and ECW in active individuals with traumatic trans-tibial amputation in different walking conditions. The secondary aim was to evaluate if this correlation permits to determine ECW from PCI values.

Methodology: Ninety traumatic amputees were enrolled. Metabolic data, heart rate and walking speed for the calculation of ECW and for PCI were computed over-ground and on a treadmill with 0% and 12% slopes during a 6-minute walking test.

Findings: There is a significant correlation between ECW and PCI walking over-ground (p=0.003; R²=0.10) and on treadmill with 12% slopes (p=0.001; R²=0.11) but there is only a poor to moderate correlation around the trendline. No significant correlation was found walking on treadmill with 0% slope. The Bland-Altman plot analysis suggests that is not possible to evaluate ECW directly from PCI.

Conclusions: PCI is a reliable alternative measure of energy expenditure during walking in active individuals with trans-tibial amputation when performing over-ground or at high intensity effort on treadmill. PCI is therefore useful only for monitoring a within subject assessment.

Keywords: Energy Cost of Walking; Gait; Lower Limb Amputation; Oxygen Consumption; Physiological Cost Index; Prosthesis; Treadmill; Walking Test.