Risk assessment of mandibular incisive canal perforation during dental implant surgery in the anterior edentulous mandible: a virtual implant placement study using cone beam computed tomography

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2023 Dec;136(6):681-685. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2023.05.012. Epub 2023 May 21.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of mandibular incisive canal (MIC) perforation caused by implants placed on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images in the edentulous mandibular anterior region.

Study design: A total of 1200 dental implants were virtually inserted on 150 eligible CBCT scans. The relationship of different implant sizes with the incidence of MIC perforation and the relationship between crest height and perforation were evaluated.

Results: A total of 1200 virtual implant applications were performed on 150 patients. In 87% of cases, MIC was identified. Perforation in 12 and 14 mm implants was significantly higher than in 8- and 10-mm implants (P < .05). Perforation was found to be statistically significantly higher in crest heights that were ≤20 mm than in crest heights >20 mm (P < .05).

Conclusions: Our results showed high perforation rates in the 12- and 14-mm implants and crests heights that were ≤20 mm during implant surgery in the mandibular anterior edentulous region. Perforation of the MIC should be considered a complication of implant surgery in the mandibular anterior region; therefore, CBCT images should be evaluated before implant placement.

MeSH terms

  • Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
  • Dental Implantation, Endosseous / adverse effects
  • Dental Implantation, Endosseous / methods
  • Dental Implants* / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Mandible / diagnostic imaging
  • Mandible / surgery
  • Risk Assessment

Substances

  • Dental Implants