Leadership cycles, styles, and antecedent factors: the perspective of coaches and young soccer athletes from national Slovak leagues

Elena Lisá; Jacinta Sousa; Catarina Morais; António Rui Gomes

doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1218290

Leadership cycles, styles, and antecedent factors: the perspective of coaches and young soccer athletes from national Slovak leagues

Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 7:14:1218290. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1218290. eCollection 2023.

Authors

Elena Lisá¹, Jacinta Sousa², Catarina Morais³, António Rui Gomes⁴

Affiliations

¹ Institute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.
² Adaptation, Performance, and Human Development Research Group, Psychology Research Centre, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
³ Faculty of Education and Psychology, Research Centre for Human Development, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal.
⁴ Psychology Research Centre, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.

Abstract

Introduction: Building positive relationships and interactions between coaches and athletes is critical to an athlete's success. The current study aimed to overview how coaches and their young athletes perceive three elements of the Leadership Efficacy Model (philosophy, practice, and criteria). The aim was examined with four goals of analysis: the perceptions of coaches and athletes about coaches' leadership philosophy, practice, and criteria (1); the differences between athletes' and coaches' perceptions of leadership cycles (2); the differences between athletes' and coaches' perceptions of leadership styles (3); and the differences between athletes' and coaches' perceptions of leadership antecedent factors (4).

Methods: The study involved 304 athletes and 20 coaches competing in the youth national leagues U15, U16, U17, and U19. Two-source data collection was applied: coaches completed the questionnaires from their point of view, and so did athletes. The coaches were paired then with their athletes to compare the answers. Coaches fulfilled Leadership Cycles Questionnaire (LEQ), Multidimensional Scale of Leadership in Sport (MSLS), and Leadership Antecedent Factors Questionnaire (LAFQ). Athletes completed the same questionnaires as the coaches did and also fulfilled the Sport Performance Perception Questionnaire (SPPQ). Athletes' age and SPPQ served as control variables.

Results: Both athletes (37.5%) and coaches (40%) perceived that the philosophy of the leadership efficacy model should be increased. Coaches evaluated their philosophy (F = 4.43; p = 0.036; η² = 0.014), support in MSLS (F = 5.05; p = 0.025; η² = 0.016) and active management in MSLS (F = 4.08; p = 0.044; η² = 0.013) higher than their athletes. The athletes assessed the maturity of the team members (LAFQ dimension) (F = 13.98; p <0.001; η² = 0.044), negative feedback in MSLS (F = 6.02; p = 0.015; η² = 0.020), and passive management in MSLS (F = 4.95; p = 0.027; η² = 0.016) higher than their coaches.

Discussion: The tendency of coaches to have a more positive perception of their leadership behavior compared to their athletes represents the coach-athlete perception gap of leadership. Future research can examine the efficacy of congruent perceptions of leadership between athletes and coaches during the sports season and the impact produced by objective performance indicators.

Keywords: football coaches; leadership efficacy model; leadership philosophy; transformational leadership; young athletes.