Cost-effectiveness of apixaban and rivaroxaban in thromboprophylaxis of cancer patients treated with chemotherapy in Spain

J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):1145-1154. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2248839. Epub 2023 Aug 21.

Abstract

Background: Apixaban and rivaroxaban are two direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) recommended for thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients treated with chemotherapy in an ambulatory setting. We aimed to assess the cost-utility of thromboprophylaxis with apixaban and rivaroxaban vs no thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory cancer patients starting chemotherapy with an intermediate-to-high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), Khorana score ≥ 2 points.

Methods: A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from the perspective of Spain's National Health System (NHS) using an analytical decision model in the short-term (180 days) and a Markov model in the long-term (5 years). Transition probabilities were obtained from randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of apixaban and rivaroxaban in adult ambulatory patients with cancer at risk for VTE, treated with chemotherapy (AVERT and CASSINI trials). The costs (€2,021) were taken from Spanish sources. The utilities of the model were obtained through the EQ-5D questionnaire. Deterministic (base case) and probabilistic (second-order Monte Carlo simulation) analyses were conducted.

Results: In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, apixaban generated a cost per patient of €1,082 ± 187, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of €713-1,442, while no prophylaxis produced a cost per patient of €1,146 ± 218, with a 95% CI of €700-1,491, with a saving of €64 per patient and a gain of 0.008 QALYs. Likewise, rivaroxaban provided a cost per patient of €993 ± 133, with a 95% CI of €748-1,310, while no prophylaxis produced a cost per patient of €872 ± 152, with a 95% CI of €602-1,250, with an additional expense of €121 per patient and a gain of 0.008 QALYs.

Conclusions: In thromboprophylaxis of cancer patients, the use of apixaban and rivaroxaban generated similar costs compared to non-prophylaxis, without the difference found being statistically significant, with a clinically insignificant QALY gain.

Keywords: C; C6; C63; Cost-effectiveness; D; D6; D61; I; I1; I10; cancer; direct-acting oral anticoagulants; thromboprophylaxis; venous thromboembolism.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Anticoagulants
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Humans
  • Neoplasms* / complications
  • Neoplasms* / drug therapy
  • Pyridones / therapeutic use
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Rivaroxaban / therapeutic use
  • Spain
  • Venous Thromboembolism*

Substances

  • Anticoagulants
  • apixaban
  • Pyridones
  • Rivaroxaban