Use of safer smoking facilities within a supervised consumption service shaped by socio-structural factors: A qualitative study

Em Pijl; Tracy Oosterbroek; Brittany Dirk; Erin Mason

doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104158

Use of safer smoking facilities within a supervised consumption service shaped by socio-structural factors: A qualitative study

Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Oct:120:104158. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104158. Epub 2023 Aug 12.

Authors

Em Pijl¹, Tracy Oosterbroek², Brittany Dirk³, Erin Mason⁴

Affiliations

¹ Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada. Electronic address: em.pijl@umanitoba.ca.
² Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada.
³ Sessional Instructor, Emergency Room RN, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada.
⁴ ARCHES, Lethbridge, Canada.

PMID: 37579616
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104158

Abstract

Background: Safer smoking facilities provide an important alternative for supervised consumption service (SCS) clients who wish to lower certain health risks associated with injecting or who wish to smoke in the safety of the SCS rather than on the street. In 2018, the first regulated safer smoking facility in North America opened as part of a new supervised consumption site in a Western Canadian city. The purpose of this research project was to understand the interplay of factors in SCS clients choosing to use safer smoking rooms instead of injecting in booths.

Method: Using a phenomenological approach, this research was guided by the question, "What personal, social and environmental factors influence SCS clients' consumption methods?" To answer this question we interviewed both clients and staff at the SCS. Participants were recruited through purposive sampling. Data was analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: The findings of this study suggest that the mode of consumption is affected by personal (personal history and preference that clients had previously pre-contemplated and established pertaining to the substances of choice), social (the desire to be with friends) and environmental (space limitations in the SCS) factors.

Conclusions: While many clients described self-determined rules around how they will consume various substances, these rules were fluid and changing depending on personal, social and environmental factors. Ensuring sufficient capacity of smoking rooms is a critical consideration in SCS and an important potential site of harm reduction.

Keywords: Drug consumption rooms; Harm reduction; Risk mitigation; Safer smoking facilities; Supervised consumption; inhalation.