Sacral insufficiency fractures can be managed conservatively, by surgical fixation or by sacroplasty. This systematic review compared the outcomes of different treatment modalities to ascertain the best. Studies included in this systematic review were those with sacral insufficiency fracture in elderly patients with some measure of outcomes reported. Fractures due to high-energy trauma or malignancy or in non-elderly patients were excluded. The review was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from inception to January 6, 2022, yielding a total of 4299 papers of which 35 were eligible for inclusion. Pain reduction following sacroplasty (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) difference 5.83, SD 1.14, n = 901) was superior compared with conservative management (VAS difference 3.7, SD 2.71, n = 65) (p <0.0001) and surgical fixation (with screws/rods +/- cement augmentation; VAS difference 4.1, SD 1.106, n = 154) (p< 0.001). There was no significant difference between pain relief following screw fixation and after conservative management (p = 0.1216). Hospital stay duration was shorter following sacroplasty (4.1 days )SD 3.9)) versus fixation (10.3 days (SD 5.59)) (p= 0.0001). Available evidence points to sacroplasty resulting in better pain relief and shorter hospital stay than other treatment options.
Keywords: conservative management; outcomes; sacral insufficiency fracture; sacroplasty; screw fixation; surgical fixation; systematic review.
Copyright © 2023, Briggs et al.