[Comparison of efficacy and safety of transurethral thulium laser vapoenucleation of prostate and transurethral thulium laser enucleation of prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia]

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Aug 15;103(30):2297-2301. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20221203-02563.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To compare early outcomes between transurethral thulium laser vapoenucleation of prostate and transurethral thulium laser enucleation of prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 1 638 BPH patients admitted to the Department of Urology of Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from January 2018 to December 2021. There were 916 patients underwent transurethral thulium laser vapoenucleation of prostate (ThuVEP group) and 722 patients underwent transurethral thulium laser enucleation of prostate (ThuLEP group). The operation time, eliminated tissue weight, surgical complications, duration of post-operative catheter implantation were compared between the two groups. The improvement of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Quality of Life Index (QoL), maximum uroflow rate (Qmax) and post-void residual urine volume (PVR) at 1 month after operation was compared between the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences in age, preoperative and 1-month postoperative prostate volume, IPSS score, QoL score, Qmax, and PVR between the ThuVEP and ThuLEP group (all P>0.05). There were no significant differences in perioperative indicators such as operation time, cutting or enucleation time, tissue crushing time, tissue weight, hemoglobin change, catheter indwelling time, and postoperative hospital stay between ThuVEP group and ThuLEP group (all P>0.05). The incidence of minor gross hematuria after extubation in the ThuVEP group was 7.8% (56/916), which was lower than 9.4% (65/722) in the ThuLEP group (P=0.026); the incidence of temporary incontinence at 1 month after surgery was 5.2% (38/916) in ThuVEP group, lower than 11.9% (86/722) in ThuLEP group (P<0.001). A total of 3 patients (0.4%) in ThuLEP group required operative intervention for severe post-operation bleeding, but none of ThuVEP group suffered from this kind of surgical complications. Conclusions: ThuVEP has similar efficacy with ThuLEP for the treatment of BPH. ThuVEP can significantly reduce the incidence of post-operation temporary urine incontinence, and has much superiority in stanching bleeding.

目的: 比较经尿道前列腺铥激光剜切术(ThuVEP)与经尿道前列腺铥激光解剖性剜除术(ThuLEP)治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的疗效和安全性。 方法: 回顾性分析上海交通大学医学院附属第一人民医院2018年1月至2021年12月采用ThuVEP或ThuLEP治疗的1 638例BPH患者的临床资料,其中ThuVEP组916例,年龄(68.8±12.9)岁;ThuLEP组722例,年龄(67.3±10.2)岁。比较两组患者术前及术后1个月国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量评分(QoL)、最大尿流率(Qmax)、残余尿(PVR),以及围手术期相关指标等的差异。 结果: ThuVEP组和ThuLEP组患者的年龄、术前以及术后1个月前列腺体积、IPSS评分、QoL评分、Qmax、PVR的差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。ThuVEP组和ThuLEP组患者的手术时间、剜切或剜除时间、组织粉碎时间、剜切或剜除组织重量、手术前后血红蛋白变化、导尿管留置时间、术后住院时间等围手术期指标差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。ThuVEP组拔管后轻微肉眼血尿的发生率为7.8%(56/916),低于ThuLEP组的9.4%(65/722)(P=0.026);ThuVEP组术后1个月暂时性尿失禁的发生率为5.2%(38/916),低于ThuLEP组的11.9%(86/722)(P<0.001)。ThuLEP组中有3例(0.4%)患者因术后严重血尿导致二次手术止血,而ThuVEP组无患者发生该严重并发症。 结论: ThuVEP与ThuLEP的手术疗效相当,ThuVEP能够显著减少术后暂时性尿失禁的发生,且在止血效果方面更加具有优势。.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • China
  • Humans
  • Laser Therapy*
  • Lasers
  • Lasers, Solid-State* / therapeutic use
  • Male
  • Prostate / surgery
  • Prostatic Hyperplasia* / drug therapy
  • Prostatic Hyperplasia* / surgery
  • Quality of Life
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Thulium / therapeutic use
  • Transurethral Resection of Prostate*
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Thulium