Endoscopic measurement of hiatal hernias: is it reliable and does it have a clinical impact? Results from a large prospective database

Postgrad Med. 2023 Aug;135(6):615-622. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2023.2239135. Epub 2023 Aug 12.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of our study was to compare the results of endoscopy and manometry with regard to the presence and longitudinal size of hiatal hernias using a cohort of patients with PPI-refractory reflux symptoms. In addition, we aimed to investigate the clinical relevance of hiatal hernias and their size in relation to the occurrence of GERD.

Methods: Five hundred patients with suspected GERD due to typical reflux symptoms (heartburn and regurgitation) and inadequate response to PPI therapy underwent standardized screening at a reflux center. After 2 weeks of PPI withdrawal, all patients underwent endoscopy, 24-h pH impedance measurement, and high-resolution manometry (HRM). Both endoscopy and HRM results were available for 487 patients.

Results: There was a high correlation between the endoscopic and manometric measured longitudinal size of hernias (rho = .768 (p < .001)). Absolute differences differ on a small effect basis (Cohen's d = 0.23). The presence of hernias increases significantly with the severity of GERD, regardless of whether the hernia was diagnosed by endoscopy or manometry.

Conclusion: In summary, endoscopically and manometrically measured hiatal hernia size are highly significantly correlated. Patients with refractory reflux symptoms and a hernia size of 4 cm are very likely to have GERD. In the future, this finding could greatly simplify the diagnosis of GERD.

Keywords: GERD; Hiatal hernia; PPI refractory reflux symptoms; endoscopy; manometry.

MeSH terms

  • Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
  • Gastroesophageal Reflux* / diagnosis
  • Gastroesophageal Reflux* / drug therapy
  • Hernia, Hiatal* / diagnosis
  • Humans
  • Manometry / methods