The anti-PD-1 era of cervical cancer: achievement, opportunity, and challenge

Front Immunol. 2023 Jul 25:14:1195476. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1195476. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Cervical cancer is one of the three major female gynecological malignancies, becoming a major global health challenge. Although about 90% of early-stage patients can be cured by surgery, advanced-stage patients still need new treatment methods to improve their efficacy, especially for those with recurrence and metastasis tumors. Anti-PD-1 is currently the most widely used immune checkpoint inhibitor, which has revolutionized cancer therapy for different types of cancer. Pembrolizumab has been approved for second-line treatment of R/M CC but has a modest overall response rate of about 15%. Therefore, multiple types of anti-PD-1 have entered clinical trials successively and evaluated the efficacy in combination with chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. At the same time, the dual specific antibody of PD-1/CTLA-4 was also used in clinical trials of cervical cancer, and the results showed better than anti-PD-1 monotherapy. In addition, anti-PD-1 has also been shown to sensitize radiotherapy. Therefore, understanding the current research progress of anti-PD-1 will better guide clinical application. This review summarizes ongoing clinical trials and published studies of anti-PD-1 monotherapy and combination therapy in the treatment of cervical cancer, as well as discusses the potential molecular biological mechanisms of combination, aiming to provide the basic evidence for support anti-PD-1 in the treatment of cervical cancer and new insights in combination immunotherapy.

Keywords: anti-PD-1; cervical cancer; chemotherapy; clinical trial; combination therapy; immunotherapy; radiotherapy; targeted therapy.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Combined Modality Therapy
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immunotherapy / methods
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms* / drug therapy

Grants and funding

This study was supported by the Capital’s Funds for Health Improvement and Research (CFH 2022-1-4011) and the National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (2022-PUMCH-B-083).