New Interpretation of Neonatal Outcomes by Phenotypically Classified Preterm Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Curr Med Sci. 2023 Aug;43(4):811-821. doi: 10.1007/s11596-023-2769-7. Epub 2023 Aug 10.

Abstract

Objective: The global aim to lower preterm birth rates has been hampered by the insufficient and incomplete understanding of its etiology, classification, and diagnosis. This study was designed to evaluate the association of phenotypically classified preterm syndromes with neonatal outcomes; to what extent would these outcomes be modified after the obstetric interventions, including use of glucocorticoid, magnesium sulfate, and progesterone.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at Tongji Hospital (composed of Main Branch, Optical Valley Branch and Sino-French New City Branch) in Wuhan. A total of 900 pregnant women and 1064 neonates were retrospectively enrolled. The outcomes were the distribution of different phenotypes among parturition signs and pathway to delivery, the association of phenotypically classified clusters with short-term unfavorable neonatal outcomes, and to what extent these outcomes could be modified by obstetric interventions.

Results: Eight clusters were identified using two-step cluster analysis, including premature rupture of fetal membranes (PPROM) phenotype, abnormal amniotic fluid (AF) phenotype, placenta previa phenotype, mixed condition phenotype, fetal distress phenotype, preeclampsia-eclampsia & hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets syndrome (PE-E&HELLP) phenotype, multiple fetus phenotype, and no main condition phenotype. Except for no main condition phenotype, the other phenotypes were associated with one or more complications, which conforms to the clinical practice. Compared with no main condition phenotype, some phenotypes were significantly associated with short-term adverse neonatal outcomes. Abnormal AF phenotype, mixed condition phenotype, PE-E&HELLP phenotype, and multiple fetus phenotype were risk factors for neonatal small-for gestation age (SGA); placenta previa phenotype was not associated with adverse outcomes except low APGAR score being 0-7 at one min; mixed condition phenotype was associated with low APGAR scores, SGA, mechanical ventilation, and grade HI-W intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH); fetal distress phenotype was frequently associated with neonatal SGA and mechanical ventilation; PE-E&HELLP phenotype was correlated with low APGAR score being 0-7 at one min, SGA and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission; multiple fetus phenotype was not a risk factor for the outcomes included except for SGA. Not all neonates benefited from obstetric interventions included in this study.

Conclusion: Our research disclosed the independent risk of different preterm phenotypes for adverse pregnancy outcomes. This study is devoted to putting forward the paradigm of classifying preterm birth phenotypically, with the ultimate purpose of defining preterm phenotypes based on multi-center studies and diving into the underlying mechanisms.

Keywords: neonatal outcomes; obstetric intervention; preterm phenotype; two-step cluster analysis.

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Fetal Distress
  • HELLP Syndrome*
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Placenta Previa*
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Complications*
  • Premature Birth*
  • Retrospective Studies