Research suggests higher neighbourhood ethnic minority density to be associated with lessened chances of ethnic group illness. We focus on the density effect on psychosis, arguing that (at higher ethnic concentrations) it acts as a contextual influence attenuating the compositional influence whereby minority ethnicity is associated with higher psychosis risk. In terms of ecological disease regression, the ethnic density effect will then be apparent in nonlinear impacts of minority concentration. Contextual effects may also be evident in spatially varying regression coefficient models for psychosis. Nonlinearity or heterogeneity may be associated with other contextual processes where geography modifies demography (e.g. deprivation amplification). We illustrate these issues with an analysis of psychosis prevalence in 4835 London neighbourhoods. The data are collected in primary care (during 2019/20) using clinical diagnosis (e.g. based on referrals to specialists or psychosis hospitalisation), and refer to patients currently under care: such care may extend retrospectively over several years. The data offer a complete population perspective in contrast to survey data, which typically offer limited geographic perspectives. We consider impacts on psychosis prevalence of non-white ethnicity, as well as those of deprivation, social fragmentation and urbanicity. We find evidence suggesting nonlinear impacts of non-white ethnicity on psychosis (essentially flat risk above a threshold concentration), but find no evidence for deprivation amplification.
Keywords: Deprivation amplification; Ecological inference; Ethnic density effect; Psychosis; Spatial regression.
Copyright © 2023 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.