Applying machine learning algorithms to protein-ligand scoring functions has aroused widespread attention in recent years due to the high predictive accuracy and affordable computational cost. Nevertheless, most machine learning-based scoring functions are only applicable to a specific task, e.g., binding affinity prediction, binding pose prediction or virtual screening, suggesting that the development of a scoring function with balanced performance in all critical tasks remains a grand challenge. To this end, we propose a novel parameterization strategy by introducing an adjustable binding affinity term that represents the correlation between the predicted outcomes and experimental data into the training of mixture density network. The resulting residue-atom distance likelihood potential not only retains the superior docking and screening power over all the other state-of-the-art approaches, but also achieves a remarkable improvement in scoring and ranking performance. We emphatically explore the impacts of several key elements on prediction accuracy as well as the task preference, and demonstrate that the performance of scoring/ranking and docking/screening tasks of a certain model could be well balanced through an appropriate manner. Overall, our study highlights the potential utility of our innovative parameterization strategy as well as the resulting scoring framework in future structure-based drug design.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.