Investigating the associations of the illness representations of gambling disorder with superstitious and responsible gambling

Anise M S Wu; Hong Mian Yang; Hui Zhou; Le Dang; Juliet Honglei Chen

doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1160781

Investigating the associations of the illness representations of gambling disorder with superstitious and responsible gambling

Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 14:14:1160781. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1160781. eCollection 2023.

Authors

Anise M S Wu^{1

2}, Hong Mian Yang^{1

2}, Hui Zhou^{1

2}, Le Dang^{1

3}, Juliet Honglei Chen^{2

4}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Macau, Taipa, Macao SAR, China.
² Centre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Institute of Collaborative Innovation, University of Macau, Taipa, Macao SAR, China.
³ Faculty of Teacher Education, Pingdingshan University, Pingdingshan, Henan, China.
⁴ Department of Psychology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China.

Abstract

Background: As a theoretical framework for understanding illness self-management, the commonsense model of self-regulation (CSM) has been commonly used to promote health behaviors. However, its application to examining gambling disorder (GD) is still in an exploratory stage.

Objectives: Based on CSM, the current study aimed to address this knowledge gap and test whether illness representations (i.e., perceived consequences, illness coherence, and emotional representations) of GD are associated with gambling behaviors (i.e., responsible gambling [RG] and superstitious gambling). We also aimed to explore the potential mediating role of positive gambling beliefs (i.e., personal responsibility about gambling and gambling literacy) in such associations.

Methods: An online questionnaire survey with snowballing sampling method was administered to Chinese adult past-year gamblers, and 603 valid responses were collected. The structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis with a bootstrapping approach was utilized to test the associations of illness representations with gambling behaviors and the hypothesized mediation effects of positive gambling beliefs.

Results: We found that (a) perceived consequences of GD had significant, positive associations with RG and negative associations with superstitious gambling, with positive gambling beliefs acting as full mediators; (b) emotional representations for GD showed significant, negative correlations with RG and positive ones with superstitious gambling, with positive gambling beliefs acting as full and partial mediators, respectively; (c) the direct effect of illness coherence of GD on superstitious gambling behaviors was unexpectedly positive, and its indirect effects via positive gambling beliefs were nonsignificant.

Discussion: Under the framework of CSM, the current findings provided new insights in understanding both controlled and at-risk gambling patterns from a perspective of illness self-management. We suggest future GD prevention campaigns may adopt psychoeducational programs to help gamblers form a better understanding about GD as an illness, which may promote RG practices and hence lower the risk of developing GD.

Keywords: commonsense model; gambling beliefs; illness perception; positive gambling; superstitious gambling.