Community Fire Risk Reduction: Longitudinal Assessment for HomeSafe Fire Prevention Program in Canada

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 15;20(14):6369. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20146369.

Abstract

(1) Background: Residential fires represent the third leading cause of unintentional injuries globally. This study aims to offer an overview and a longitudinal evaluation of the HomeSafe program implemented in Surrey in 2008 and to assess its effectiveness in mitigating fire-related outcomes. (2) Methods: Data were collected over a 12-year period (2008-2019). Assessed outcomes comprised frequency of fire incidents, residential fires, casualties, functioning smoke alarms, and contained fires. The effectiveness of each initiative was determined by comparing the specific intervention group outcome and the city-wide outcome to the pre-intervention period. (3) Results: This study targeted 120,349 households. HomeSafe achieved overwhelming success in decreasing fire rates (-80%), increasing functioning smoke alarms (+60%), increasing the percentage of contained fires (+94%), and decreasing fire casualties (-40%). The study findings confirm that the three most effective HomeSafe initiatives were firefighters' visits of households, inspections and installations of smoke alarms, and verifications of fire crew alarms at fire incidents. Some initiatives were less successful, including post-door hangers (+12%) and package distribution (+15%). (4) Conclusions: The HomeSafe program effectively decreased the occurrence and magnitude of residential fires. Lessons learned should be transferred to similar contexts to implement an evidence-based, consistent, and systematic approach to sustainable fire prevention initiatives.

Keywords: injury prevention; intervention strategies; longitudinal study; residential fires; risk management.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Canada
  • Firefighters*
  • Fires* / prevention & control
  • Humans
  • Protective Devices
  • Smoke

Substances

  • Smoke

Grants and funding

This research was funded by the City of Surrey Fire Services Grant. Funding number 01.