Fluorescence-guided surgery can aid in the intraoperative visualization of target tissues, with promising applications in human and veterinary surgical oncology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performances of two fluoresce camera systems, IC-FlowTM and VisionsenseTM VS3 Iridum, for the detection of two non-targeted (ICG and IRDye-800) and two targeted fluorophores (AngiostampTM and FAP-Cyan) under different room light conditions, including ambient light, new generation LED, and halogen artificial light sources, which are commonly used in operating theaters. Six dilutions of the fluorophores were imaged in phantom kits using the two camera systems. The limit of detection (LOD) and mean signal-to-background ratio (mSBR) were determined. The highest values of mSBR and a lower LOD were obtained in dark conditions for both systems. Under room lights, the capabilities decreased, but the mSBR remained greater than 3 (=clearly detectable signal). LOD and mSBR worsened under surgical lights for both camera systems, with a greater impact from halogen bulbs on VisionsenseTM VS3 Iridium and of the LED lights on IC-Flow due to a contribution of these lights in the near-infrared spectrum. When considering implementing FGS into the clinical routine, surgeons should cautiously evaluate the spectral contribution of the lights in the operating theater.
Keywords: fluorescence-guided surgery; near-infrared imaging; surgical oncology.