Small ponds have stronger potential for net nitrogen removal: Insight from direct dissolved N2 measurement

Wangshou Zhang; Hengpeng Li; Heng Cao; Xiaofan Zhao

doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165765

Small ponds have stronger potential for net nitrogen removal: Insight from direct dissolved N₂ measurement

Sci Total Environ. 2023 Nov 20:900:165765. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165765. Epub 2023 Jul 26.

Authors

Wangshou Zhang¹, Hengpeng Li², Heng Cao³, Xiaofan Zhao³

Affiliations

¹ Key Laboratory of Watershed Geographic Sciences, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China. Electronic address: wszhang@niglas.ac.cn.
² Key Laboratory of Watershed Geographic Sciences, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China. Electronic address: hpli@niglas.ac.cn.
³ Key Laboratory of Watershed Geographic Sciences, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China; College of Water Conservancy Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China.

PMID: 37506899
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165765

Abstract

Growing demands for watershed nitrogen (N) removal have called attention to abundant small bodies of water such as ponds, which have long been heralded as efficient storage and processing systems. Although pond conservation, restoration, and creation have been widely implemented to mitigate N pollution, information is limited regarding the impact of size-that is, whether N removal potential and efficiency are dependent upon pond size. We investigated the dynamics of N removal rates in 56 ponds from a hilly watershed by studying their bimonthly N₂ concentrations and fluxes. Our results showed that smaller ponds performed better in net N removal. This can be discerned from the areal N₂ fluxes, which were the highest in small ponds (< 4, 000 m²). The corresponding N₂ fluxes (4.73 ± 4.53 mmol N₂ m^-2 d^-1) were 2 to 14 times greater than those observed in larger ponds. The N removal efficiency, a metric used to describe the portions of the substrates released as N₂, was also significantly higher in the small ponds (∼8.7 %) than in the larger ponds (∼5.0 %). Further regression analysis showed that both areal N₂ flux and N removal efficiency were negatively correlated with pond area. The underlying mechanisms behind the size effects of N removal could be attributed to small ponds having larger sediment contact area to water volume ratios. Thus, smaller ponds allow more opportunities for N to interact with bioactive sediments than larger ponds. Overall, our findings contribute to the understanding of the distal role of pond size in affecting N removal. This research also provides a strong rationale for considering the effects of system size when implementing management practices dedicated to maximizing N removal.

Keywords: Denitrification rate; Lowland pond; N(2) flux; Nitrogen pollution.