Canadian Consensus Recommendations on the Management of Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Curr Oncol. 2023 Jun 30;30(7):6289-6315. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30070465.

Abstract

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive, neuroendocrine tumour with high relapse rates, and significant morbidity and mortality. Apart from advances in radiation therapy, progress in the systemic treatment of SCLC had been stagnant for over three decades despite multiple attempts to develop alternative therapeutic options that could improve responses and survival. Recent promising developments in first-line and subsequent therapeutic approaches prompted a Canadian Expert Panel to convene to review evidence, discuss practice patterns, and reach a consensus on the treatment of extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). The literature search included guidelines, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials. Regular meetings were held from September 2022 to March 2023 to discuss the available evidence to propose and agree upon specific recommendations. The panel addressed biomarkers and histological features that distinguish SCLC from non-SCLC and other neuroendocrine tumours. Evidence for initial and subsequent systemic therapies was reviewed with consideration for patient performance status, comorbidities, and the involvement and function of other organs. The resulting consensus recommendations herein will help clarify evidence-based management of ES-SCLC in routine practice, help clinician decision-making, and facilitate the best patient outcomes.

Keywords: PD-1; PD-L1; etoposide; extensive stage small-cell lung cancer; immune checkpoint inhibitors; platinum; radiation therapy.

Publication types

  • Guideline
  • Review
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Canada
  • Combined Modality Therapy
  • Consensus
  • Humans
  • Lung Neoplasms* / drug therapy
  • Small Cell Lung Carcinoma* / drug therapy

Grants and funding

Funding for the development and publishing of this manuscript (expert panel meetings, medical writing support, and journal submission support) was provided by AstraZeneca, Hoffmann-La Roche, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals in the form of unrestricted educational grants. The funder did not participate in expert panel meetings (was not present) and had no role in the writing, editing and submission of the manuscript.