Objective: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy of a 14-coil (Target XL) for framing in coil embolization of small cerebral aneurysms.
Methods: Between January 2017 and December 2018, 46 patients underwent coil embolization of a small cerebral aneurysm that was less than 5 mm in maximum diameter. They were categorized into 26 patients in whom only 10-coils were used and 20 in whom Target XL was used for framing. The volume embolization rate (VER) and recanalization rate were compared between the two groups.
Results: Although there were two patients in whom Target XL was replaced with a 10-coil for framing, no adverse events associated with the use of Target XL were noted. The mean VER of the first framing coil was significantly higher in aneurysms that were framed with Target XL than in those framed with a 10-coil (Target XL 22.6 ± 4.5%, 10-coil 17.9 ± 8.4%; p = 0.03). Furthermore, the mean VER at the end of the procedure was significantly higher in aneurysms with Target XL used for framing than in those embolized using only 10-coils (14-coil: 36.8 ± 7.8%, 10-coil: 32.0 ± 6.5%; p = 0.03). No recanalization was observed in aneurysms for which Target XL was used for framing, whereas five aneurysms embolized using only 10-coils were recanalized.
Conclusion: Target XL may be safe and feasible as a framing coil in coil embolization of small cerebral aneurysms, which may result in a high VER, low recanalization rate, and good outcome.
Keywords: 14-coil; framing; recanalization rate; small cerebral aneurysm; volume embolization rate.
©2020 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy.