"No Good Choice": What are the Issues of Having no Harm Reduction Strategies in Hospitals?

Cheryl Forchuk; Jonathan Serrato; Leanne Scott; Abraham Rudnick; Chandlee Dickey; Michael Silverman

doi:10.1177/11782218231186065

"No Good Choice": What are the Issues of Having no Harm Reduction Strategies in Hospitals?

Subst Abuse. 2023 Jul 16:17:11782218231186065. doi: 10.1177/11782218231186065. eCollection 2023.

Authors

Cheryl Forchuk^{1

2}, Jonathan Serrato², Leanne Scott², Abraham Rudnick³, Chandlee Dickey⁴, Michael Silverman⁴

Affiliations

¹ Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
² Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.
³ Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
⁴ London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.

Abstract

Background: Despite an increase in methamphetamine use and subsequent hospitalizations, the majority of Canadian hospitals currently lack harm reduction strategies for substance use. This can mean that people with lived experience of methamphetamine use are faced with a number of difficult decisions to make when admitted to hospital. Caring for people with lived experience of methamphetamine use can also be problematic with zero tolerance policies requiring abstinence to be maintained. This analysis set out to understand potential health care issues due to a lack of harm reduction strategies from the prospective of people with lived experience of methamphetamine use as well as health care/service professionals.

Methods: Based on a larger study, this secondary analysis explored issues discussed by people with lived experience of methamphetamine use and health care/service professionals regarding the challenges of providing harm reduction approaches in the hospital setting. A total of 108 individuals with lived experience of methamphetamine use completed a qualitative component of a mixed-method interview. In addition, 31 health care/service professionals participated in virtual focus groups and one-to-one interviews. Responses were analyzed using an ethnographic thematic approach.

Results: People with lived experience of methamphetamine use reported 3 choices upon admission: leave or avoid the hospital, stay but experience unsupported withdrawal, or stay but hide their substance usage from health care professionals. Health care/service professionals described 2 options: uphold zero tolerance that can lead to stigma and a lack of knowledge regarding addiction, or accept harm reduction but be unable to implement such strategies. This could lead to health being compromised due to policy and practice that requires abstinence. Neither group of participants described a good choice for them.

Conclusion: Current policy and education related to substance use needs to be revised.

Keywords: Hospital; health care; methamphetamine; nursing; substance use.