[The identification process of the state of fractures by orthopedic surgeons before radiography]

Zhonghua Yi Shi Za Zhi. 2023 May 28;53(3):171-175. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112155-20220706-00096.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Fracture treatment requires a detailed understanding of the state and displacement of the fracture site. Before X-ray was discovered by Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen in 1895, it was almost impossible to know the location of the fracture fragments wrapped in skin and muscle. The early classical theories for this were mainly based on the medical theories of Hippocrates and Galen. The more clinical cases were accumulated, the more cases were inconsistent with the classical theories. Doctors either chose to stick to the classics for their diagnose or believed in their own judgment. The development of anatomy gradually became a means of examining fracture fragments. With the development of anatomy during and after the "Renaissance", doctors began to collect a large number of bone specimens and communicated this information to other doctors. Doctors discarded the strict adherence to early classical theories, and finally constructed a theoretical model to explain clinical questions with anatomical evidence.

骨折治疗需要详细了解骨折端的形态及移位状况。在伦琴发现X线之前,没有显示位于皮肤和肌肉之中骨折端位置情况的方法。对于骨关节损伤的认识和治疗,唯经典理论时期主要基于希波克拉底和盖伦的医学理论,随着骨关节损伤临床病例的积累,与经典不相符合的例证屡见不鲜。医师是选择坚守经典还是坚信自己的判断,解剖学的发展逐渐成为检验医师认识对错的手段。“文艺复兴”时期及以后,伴随解剖学的繁荣,大量骨骼标本的收藏和医师间的交流,医师摆脱了对早期经典理论的严格遵循,最终形成了以解剖学证据解释骨关节损伤临床疑问的理论模式。.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Orthopedic Surgeons*
  • Radiography