DiI is a lipophilic fluorescent dye frequently used to label and trace cells in cell cultures and xenograft models. However, DiI can also transfer from labeled to unlabeled cells, including host organism cells, and label dead cells obscuring interpretation of the results. These limitations of DiI labeling in xenograft models have not been thoroughly investigated. Here we labeled green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing MDA-MB-231 cells with DiI to directly compare tumor growth assessment in zebrafish xenografts using the DiI labeling and GFP fluorescence. Our results indicate that the DiI based assessment significantly overestimated tumor growth in zebrafish xenograft models compared to the GFP fluorescence based assessment. The imaging of DiI labeled GFP-expressing MDA-MB-231 cell cultures indicated that the DiI labeling of the membrane is uneven. Analysis of the DiI labeled GFP-expressing MDA-MB-231 cell cultures with flow cytometry indicated that the DiI labeling varied over time while the GFP fluorescence remained unchanged, suggesting that the GFP fluorescence is a more reliable signal for monitoring tumor progression than the DiI labeling. Taken together, our results demonstrate limitations of using DiI labeling for xenograft models and emphasize the need for validating the results based on DiI labeling with other orthogonal methods, such as the ones utilizing genetically encoded fluorophores.
Keywords: Breast cancer; DiI; GFP, lipophilic dye; MDA-MB-231, xenograft; zebrafish.