Randomized Controlled Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Africa: A Systematic Review

Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2023 Oct 26;10(4):422-436. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0387.

Abstract

Background: The rising burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in African countries is attributed to the growing and aging of the populations, lifestyles, and environmental changes. This systematic review aims to map the available evidence on COPD interventions in Africa.

Methods: We performed a systematic search in 6 databases (including local African databases) and registries with updates through January 2022. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included patients diagnosed with COPD and were conducted in Africa, studying outcomes on acute respiratory episodes and rates, physical and functional abilities, and adverse events. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. We primarily summarized the results in narrative form.

Results: Out of 1594 identified publications, we included 18 studies with a total of 1504 participants, conducted in Egypt, South Africa, and Tunisia. Eight studies investigated interventions for patients in stable phases treated in outpatient settings, and 10 included patients with acute COPD exacerbations treated in emergency or intensive care settings. The interventions mainly included ventilatory support and pharmacological and rehabilitative interventions. Reported treatment effects were heterogeneous, ranging from no beneficial effects to clinically relevant benefits.

Conclusions: The included studies were conducted in countries with high infrastructural development and half of them were set in intensive care units. Despite the paucity of RCTs on COPD management, research activities have been increasing over the last several years.

Keywords: chronic lung diseases; non-communicable diseases; pulmonology; randomized controlled trials; systematic review.

Grants and funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.