Smartphone technology has been used for at-home health monitoring, but there are few available applications (apps) for tracking acoustic measures of voice for those with chronic voice problems. Current apps limit the user by restricting the range of smartphone positions to those that are unnatural and non-interactive. Therefore, we aimed to understand how more natural smartphone positions impacted the accuracy of acoustic measures in comparison to clinically acquired and derived measures. Fifty-six adults (11 vocally healthy, 45 voice disordered, aged 18-80 years) completed voice recordings while holding their smartphones in four different positions (e.g., as if reading from the phone, up to the ear, etc.) while a head-mounted high-quality microphone attached to a handheld acoustic recorder simultaneously captured voice recordings. Comparisons revealed that mean fundamental frequency (Hz), maximum phonation time (s), and cepstral peak prominence (CPP; dB) were not impacted by phone position; however, CPP was significantly lower on smartphone recordings than handheld recordings. Spectral measures (low-to-high spectral ratio, harmonics-to-noise ratio) were impacted by the phone position and the recording device. These results indicate that more natural phone positions can be used to capture specific voice measures, but not all are directly comparable to clinically derived values.
© 2023 Acoustical Society of America.