How to implement patient experience surveys and use their findings for service improvement: a qualitative expert consultation study in Australian general practice

Hyun Jung Song; Sarah Dennis; Jean-Frédéric Levesque; Mark Harris

doi:10.1136/ihj-2019-000033

How to implement patient experience surveys and use their findings for service improvement: a qualitative expert consultation study in Australian general practice

Integr Healthc J. 2020 Nov 1;2(1):e000033. doi: 10.1136/ihj-2019-000033. eCollection 2020.

Authors

Hyun Jung Song¹, Sarah Dennis^{1

2

3}, Jean-Frédéric Levesque^{1

4}, Mark Harris¹

Affiliations

¹ Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
² Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
³ Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.
⁴ NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation, Chatwood, New South Wales, Australia.

Abstract

Objective: To identify barriers (patient, provider, practice and system levels) to consider when implementing patient experience surveys in Australian general practice and enablers of their systematic use to inform service improvement in clinical practice as well as the broader health system.

Methods and analysis: An expert consultation and qualitative content analysis of cross-sectional, open-text survey data. Data were collected from key international and Australian experts in the areas of measurement and quality improvement in general practice.

Results: Responses from 20 participants from six countries were included in the study. Participants discussed the importance of ensuring value and relevance of surveys to stakeholders. Lack of resources, IT infrastructure, capacity building and sustained funding were identified as barriers to implementing surveys. Participants discussed the importance of clearly defining and communicating the purpose of surveys and agreed on the value of using patient experience to inform reflective, team-based learning at the practice level. Opinions differed on the use of patient experience data at the system level, with some questioning its utility or fairness for external performance reporting. Others recommended the aggregation and reporting of these data under certain conditions, including for the purpose of triangulation with other quality and outcome data. The study identified an evidence gap in the assessment and interpretation of patient experience data at the practice and system levels, including the analysis and contextualisation of survey findings at the system level.

Conclusion: Patient experience surveys have potential for guiding practice level quality improvement, but many barriers to their implementation remain. There is need for greater research and policy efforts to understand how this information can be used at the system level for improving Australian general practice.

Keywords: general practice; healthcare quality improvement; patient satisfaction; performance measures; surveys.