Urban road networks (URNs), as simplified views and important components of cities, have different structures, resulting in varying levels of transport efficiency, accessibility, resilience, and many socio-economic indicators. Thus, topological characteristics of URNs have received great attention in the literature, while existing studies have used various boundaries to extract URNs for analysis. This naturally leads to the question of whether topological patterns concluded using small-size boundaries keep consistent with those uncovered using commonly adopted administrative boundaries or daily travel range-based boundaries. This paper conducts a large-scale empirical analysis to reveal the boundary effects on 22 topological metrics of URNs across 363 cities in mainland China. Statistical results show that boundaries have negligible effects on the average node degree, edge density, orientation entropy of road segments, and the eccentricity for the shortest or fastest routes, while other metrics including the clustering coefficient, proportion of high-level road segments, and average edge length together with route-related metrics such as average angular deviation show significant differences between road networks extracted using different boundaries. In addition, the high-centrality components identified using varied boundaries show significant differences in terms of their locations, with only 21%-28% of high-centrality nodes overlapping between the road networks extracted using administrative and daily travel range-based boundaries. These findings provide useful insights to assist urban planning and better predict the influence of a road network structure on the movement of people and the flow of socio-economic activities, particularly in the context of rapid urbanization and the ever-increasing sprawl of road networks.
© 2023 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.