Background: The American Heart Association (AHA) recommends cuff sizes of blood pressure (BP) monitoring devices based on patient arm circumference, which is critical for accurate BP measurement. This study aimed to assess cuff size variation across validated BP devices and to examine the degree of alignment with the AHA recommendations.
Methods: Data on home BP devices were obtained from the US BP Validated Device Listing website and listed cuff sizes were compared against AHA recommendations: small adult (22-26 cm), adult (27-34 cm), large (35-44 cm), and extra-large (XL) (45-52 cm).
Results: There were 42 home validated BP devices from 13 manufacturers, and none offered cuffs that were aligned with the AHA recommendations. Over half of the devices (22, 52.4%) were compatible with only a broad-range cuff, generally excluding arm sizes larger than 44 cm. Only 5 devices from 4 manufacturers offered a cuff labeled "XL," and of these, only 3 devices had sizes that covered the AHA XL range. Terminology lacked consistency with manufacturers using: different labels to describe the same-sized cuffs (e.g., 22-42 cm was labeled "integrated," "standard," "adult," "large," and "wide range"); the same labels to describe differently sized cuffs (e.g., cuffs labeled "large" were sized 22-42 cm, 32-38 cm, 32-42 cm, 36-45 cm).
Conclusions: Manufacturers of US home BP devices employ inconsistent terminologies and thresholds for cuff sizes, and sizes were not aligned with AHA recommendations. This lack of standardization could pose challenges for clinicians and patients attempting to select a properly sized cuff to support hypertension diagnosis and management.
Keywords: SMBP; blood pressure; cardiovascular disease; hypertension; prevention; self-measured blood pressure monitoring.
© Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Journal of Hypertension Ltd 2023.