Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Does a Consensus Exist for Diagnosis?

Devin W Collins; David Rehak; Alex Dawes; Dylon P Collins; Charles Daly; Eric R Wagner; Michael B Gottschalk

doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.05.014

Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Does a Consensus Exist for Diagnosis?

J Hand Surg Am. 2023 Jul 7:S0363-5023(23)00285-X. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.05.014. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Devin W Collins¹, David Rehak², Alex Dawes³, Dylon P Collins⁴, Charles Daly³, Eric R Wagner³, Michael B Gottschalk³

Affiliations

¹ Hand and Upper Extremity Department, Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Tampa Bay, FL; Hughston Clinic, Columbus, GA. Electronic address: DevinCollins71@gmail.com.
² Hughston Clinic, Columbus, GA.
³ Department of Orthopaedics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
⁴ Nova Southeastern University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Davie, FL.

PMID: 37422755
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.05.014

Abstract

Purpose: Cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) is the second most common compressive neuropathy of the upper extremity. We aimed to determine a consensus among experts using the Delphi method for clinical criteria that could be validated further for the diagnosis of CuTS.

Methods: The Delphi method was used for establishing a consensus among a group of expert panelists, comprising 12 hand and upper-extremity surgeons, who ranked the diagnostic clinical importance of 55 items related to CuTS on a scale from 1 (least important) to 10 (most important). The average and SDs of each item were calculated, and Cronbach α was used to assess homogeneity among the panelist-ranked items.

Results: All panelists answered the 55-item questionnaire. A Cronbach α value of 0.963 was obtained on the first iteration. The top criteria that were considered most clinically relevant to the diagnosis of CuTS among the group were determined based on the most highly ranked and correlated items among the expert panelist group. The criteria based on which there was agreement were as follows: (1) paresthesias in ulnar nerve distribution, (2) symptoms precipitated by increased elbow flexion/positive elbow flexion tests, (3) positive Tinel sign at the medial elbow, (4) atrophy/weakness/ late findings (eg, claw hand of the ring/small finger and Wartenberg or Froment sign) of ulnar nerve-innervated muscles of the hand, (5) loss of two-point discrimination in ulnar nerve distribution, and (6) similar symptoms on the involved side after successful treatment on the contralateral side.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrated a consensus among an expert panelist group of hand and upper-extremity surgeons on potential diagnostic criteria for CuTS. This consensus on diagnostic criteria may help clinicians readily diagnose CuTS in a standardized form; however, further weighting and validation are necessary prior to the development of a formal diagnostic scale.

Clinical relevance: This study is the first step in producing a consensus on how to diagnose CuTS.

Keywords: Cubital tunnel syndrome; ulnar nerve; ulnar neuropathy.