A genetic tradeoff for tolerance to moderate and severe heat stress in US hybrid maize

PLoS Genet. 2023 Jul 6;19(7):e1010799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010799. eCollection 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Global climate change is increasing both average temperatures and the frequencies of extreme high temperatures. Past studies have documented a strong negative effect of exposures to temperatures >30°C on hybrid maize yields. However, these studies could not disentangle genetic adaptation via artificial selection from changes in agronomic practices. Because most of the earliest maize hybrids are no longer available, side-by-side comparisons with modern hybrids under current field conditions are generally impossible. Here, we report on the collection and curation of 81 years of public yield trial records covering 4,730 maize hybrids, which enabled us to model genetic variation for temperature responses among maize hybrids. We show that selection may have indirectly and inconsistently contributed to the genetic adaptation of maize to moderate heat stress over this time period while preserving genetic variance for continued adaptation. However, our results reveal the existence of a genetic tradeoff for tolerance to moderate and severe heat stress, leading to a decrease in tolerance to severe heat stress over the same time period. Both trends are particularly conspicuous since the mid-1970s. Such a tradeoff poses challenges to the continued adaptation of maize to warming climates due to a projected increase in the frequency of extreme heat events. Nevertheless, given recent advances in phenomics, enviromics, and physiological modeling, our results offer a degree of optimism for the capacity of plant breeders to adapt maize to warming climates, assuming appropriate levels of R&D investment.

MeSH terms

  • Agriculture* / methods
  • Climate Change
  • Heat-Shock Response / genetics
  • Temperature
  • Zea mays* / genetics

Grants and funding

This research was supported by the following grants awarded to PSS: Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) grant No. DEAR0000826 (https://arpa-e.energy.gov/), USDA Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI) grant Nos. 2017-67007-26175 and 2017-67013-26463, and USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) grant No. 2012-67009-19713 (https://www.nifa.usda.gov/). This research was also supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) grant No. DMS 2113713 (https://www.nsf.gov/) to XD. AK’s salary was partially supported by USDA AFRI grant 2017-67007-26175. XD’s salary was partially supported by NSF grant No. DMS 2113713. SS’ salary was partially supported by USDA NIFA grant No. 2012-67009-19713. C-TY’s salary was partially supported by ARPA-E grant No. DEAR0000826, USDA NIFA grant No. 2012-67009-19713, and USDA AFRI grant No. 2017-67013-26463. PSS’ salary was partially supported by ARPA-E grant No. DEAR0000826 and USDA NIFA grant No. 2012-67009-19713. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.