Perception is influenced by predictions about the sensory environment. These predictions are informed by past experience and can be shaped by exposure to recurring patterns of sensory stimulation. Predictions can enhance perception of a predicted stimulus, but they can also suppress it by favoring novel and unexpected sensory information that is inconsistent with the predictions. Here we employed statistical learning to assess the effects of exposure to consistent sequences of oriented gratings on subsequent visual perceptual selection, as measured with binocular rivalry. Following statistical learning, the first portion of a learned sequence of stimulus orientations was presented to both eyes, followed by simultaneous presentation of the next grating in the sequence to one eye and an orthogonal unexpected orientation to the other eye. We found that subjects were more likely to perceive the grating that matched the orientation that was consistent with the predictive context. That is, observers were more likely to see what they expected to see, compared to the likelihood of perceiving the unexpected stimulus. Some other studies in the literature have reported the opposite effect of prediction on visual perceptual selection, and we suggest that these inconsistencies may be due to differences across studies in the level of the visual processing hierarchy at which competing perceptual interpretations are resolved.