A Channel-Dimensional Feature-Reconstructed Deep Learning Model for Predicting Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes on Overall b-Value Diffusion-Weighted MRI

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Apr;59(4):1425-1435. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28895. Epub 2023 Jul 5.

Abstract

Background: Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI commonly outperforms diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI in breast cancer discrimination. However, the side effects of contrast agents limit the use of DCE-MRI, particularly in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Purpose: To develop a novel deep learning model to fully exploit the potential of overall b-value DW-MRI without the need for a contrast agent in predicting breast cancer molecular subtypes and to evaluate its performance in comparison with DCE-MRI.

Study type: Prospective.

Subjects: 486 female breast cancer patients (training/validation/test: 64%/16%/20%).

Field strength/sequence: 3.0 T/DW-MRI (13 b-values) and DCE-MRI (one precontrast and five postcontrast phases).

Assessment: The breast cancers were divided into four subtypes: luminal A, luminal B, HER2+, and triple negative. A channel-dimensional feature-reconstructed (CDFR) deep neural network (DNN) was proposed to predict these subtypes using pathological diagnosis as the reference standard. Additionally, a non-CDFR DNN (NCDFR-DNN) was built for comparative purposes. A mixture ensemble DNN (ME-DNN) integrating two CDFR-DNNs was constructed to identify subtypes on multiparametric MRI (MP-MRI) combing DW-MRI and DCE-MRI.

Statistical tests: Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Model comparisons were performed using the one-way analysis of variance with least significant difference post hoc test and the DeLong test. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: The CDFR-DNN (accuracies, 0.79 ~ 0.80; AUCs, 0.93 ~ 0.94) demonstrated significantly improved predictive performance than the NCDFR-DNN (accuracies, 0.76 ~ 0.78; AUCs, 0.92 ~ 0.93) on DW-MRI. Utilizing the CDFR-DNN, DW-MRI attained the predictive performance equal (P = 0.065 ~ 1.000) to DCE-MRI (accuracies, 0.79 ~ 0.80; AUCs, 0.93 ~ 0.95). The predictive performance of the ME-DNN on MP-MRI (accuracies, 0.85 ~ 0.87; AUCs, 0.96 ~ 0.97) was superior to those of both the CDFR-DNN and NCDFR-DNN on either DW-MRI or DCE-MRI.

Data conclusion: The CDFR-DNN enabled overall b-value DW-MRI to achieve the predictive performance comparable to DCE-MRI. MP-MRI outperformed DW-MRI and DCE-MRI in subtype prediction.

Level of evidence: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 1.

Keywords: breast cancer; deep learning; diffusion-weighted; dynamic contrast-enhanced; magnetic resonance imaging; molecular subtype.

MeSH terms

  • Breast Neoplasms* / pathology
  • Contrast Media
  • Deep Learning*
  • Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods
  • Prospective Studies
  • Retrospective Studies

Substances

  • Contrast Media