Ethical concerns surrounding sex prediction using noninvasive prenatal screening from pediatric endocrinologists' perspective

J Genet Couns. 2023 Oct;32(5):937-941. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1649. Epub 2023 Jul 4.

Abstract

Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) with predicted fetal sex chromosomes included in the results has become increasingly available for pregnant individuals. Predicted fetal sex chromosome results from NIPS are interpreted so as to equate sex chromosomes with sex and gender. As pediatric endocrinologists, we worry about how this use of NIPS harmfully reinforces sex and gender binaries and sets potentially inaccurate assumptions about what the identified chromosomes mean. We use a hypothetical case based on our clinical experience in which the NIPS report of fetal sex does not conform to expectations at birth to highlight ethical concerns surrounding this practice. The use of NIPS for fetal sex chromosome prediction has the potential to perpetuate stigma and bring psychological harm to parents and their future children, particularly those who are intersex, transgender, and gender diverse. The medical community should adopt an approach to the use of NIPS for fetal sex chromosome prediction that recognizes the spectrums of sex and gender to avoid reproducing stigma towards sex- and gender-diverse individuals and associated harms.

Keywords: ethics; gender; genetic testing; noninvasive prenatal screening; pediatrics; sex.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Aneuploidy
  • Child
  • Endocrinologists
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Noninvasive Prenatal Testing*
  • Pregnancy
  • Prenatal Care
  • Prenatal Diagnosis* / methods