Background: Since the initial introduction by Tonnard in 2013, numerous studies have reported positive findings after employing nanofat; however, concerns exist regarding its effects and mechanisms, and various methods to generate nanofat also remain unclear. The systematic review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of sole nanofat grafting in plastic and reconstructive surgery.
Methods: The MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched for studies related to sole nanofat grafting in plastic and reconstructive surgery (November 23rd, 2022). Outcomes of interest were all clinical results on humans or animals.
Results: Twelve studies were included, and no meta-analysis was conducted due to the clinical heterogeneity of the studies. In general, included studies had a low level of evidence. Six studies (n=253) showed significant improvements in scar characteristics via evaluation of the POSAS scales, FACE-Q scale, physician assessment, patient satisfaction, or VSS scale. Four studies described its benefits in skin rejuvenation (wrinkles, fine rhytides, pigmentation, or discoloration) via photographs, questionnaires, or indentation indices. Histological evaluation illustrated overall increases of skin thickness, collagen, and elastic fibers. Three experimental studies showed beneficial effects of nanofat on fat grafting, diabetic wound healing, and hair growth with compelling histological evidence. No severe complication was reported.
Conclusion: Sole nanofat grafting shows potential benefits in scar treatment and anti-aging with conclusive histological evidence. Clinical studies about fat grafting, wound healing, or hair growth should be conducted, based on the foundation in this systematic review. Nanofat grafting could be a practical and safe procedure.
Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.