Multidrug resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli threaten the preservation of antimicrobials to treat infections in humans and livestock. Thus, it is important to understand where antimicrobial-resistant E. coli persist and factors that contribute to its their development. Crossbred cattle (n = 249; body weight = 244 kg ±25 kg standard deviation) were blocked by arrival date and assigned metaphylactic antimicrobial treatments of sterile saline control, tulathromycin (TUL), ceftiofur, or florfenicol at random. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (COTR) and third-generation cephalosporin (CTXR)-resistant E. coli were isolated from fecal samples on days 0, 28, 56, 112, 182, and study END (day 252 for block 1 and day 242 for block 2). Then, susceptibility testing was conducted on all confirmed isolates. MDR was detected in both COTR and CTXR E. coli isolates. In COTR isolates, the number of antimicrobials each isolate was resistant to and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ceftriaxone, and gentamicin was greatest on day 28 compared with all other days (p ≤ 0.04). Similarly, chloramphenicol MIC was greater on day 28 than on day 0 (p < 0.01). Overall, sulfisoxazole MIC was less for TUL than all other treatments (p ≤ 0.02), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole MIC was greater for TUL than all other treatments (p ≤ 0.03). Finally, there was no effect of treatment, day, or treatment × day for tetracycline or meropenem MIC (p ≥ 0.07). In CTXR isolates, there was an effect of day for all antimicrobials tested except ampicillin and meropenem (p ≤ 0.06). In conclusion, administering a metaphylactic antimicrobial at feedlot arrival did influence the susceptibility of COTR and CTXR E. coli. However, MDR E. coli are widely distributed, and the MIC for most antimicrobials was not different from the initial value upon completion of the feeding period.
Keywords: Escherichia coli; antimicrobial resistance; feedlot cattle; longitudinal; metaphylaxis; susceptibility.