EVALUATION OF PHENOTYPIC AND MOLECULAR TECHNIQUE IN THE DETECTION OF EXTENDED SPECTRUM BETA-LACTAMASE (ESBL)-PRODUCING GRAM NEGATIVE BACILLI IN OGUN STATE, NIGERIA

T A Ajani; C J Elikwu; C G Anaedobe; C N Onwuzo; B Tayo; C C Okangba; O B Makanjuola

EVALUATION OF PHENOTYPIC AND MOLECULAR TECHNIQUE IN THE DETECTION OF EXTENDED SPECTRUM BETA-LACTAMASE (ESBL)-PRODUCING GRAM NEGATIVE BACILLI IN OGUN STATE, NIGERIA

Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2022 Dec;20(2):160-168.

Authors

T A Ajani¹, C J Elikwu², C G Anaedobe³, C N Onwuzo², B Tayo², C C Okangba², O B Makanjuola^{1

4}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
² Department of Medical Microbiology, Benjamin Carson (Snr) College of Health and Medical Sciences, Babcock University, Ilisan Remo, Nigeria.
³ Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, College of Health Sciences, University of Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria.
⁴ Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.

PMID: 37384347
PMCID: PMC10295097

Abstract

Background: Molecular diagnosis though faster and more sensitive than phenotypic techniques, is more expensive. Resource limited settings are thus limited to using more of phenotypic rather than molecular methods in the routine detection of Extended Spectrum beta lactamases (ESBL).

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of double disc synergy test (DSST) and Epsilometer (E) test with Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and to detect the risk factors associated with ESBL producing organisms among in-patients at Babcock University Teaching Hospital, Ilishan-Remo, Nigeria.

Methodology: Hospital-based cross-sectional study in which bacterial isolates of 165 in-patients were collected fromMarch 2018 to September 2019. The isolates were evaluated for ESBL production by the use of DDST, Etest and PCR. The performance evaluation was done. Questionnaire was used to assess the risk factors associated with ESBL, IBM SPSS Version 23 was used to analyze the data.

Results: The participants' isolates yielded 50/165 (30.3%) that were ESBL positive by DDST, 47/165 (28.9%) by E-test and 48/165(29.1%) by PCR. Sensitivity and specificity of DSST was 100% and 98.3% while that of E-test was 98% and 100% respectively. Age, antibiotics intake without prescription, being on ventilator, urethral catheterization and nasogastric tubes were all significantly associated with presence of ESBL (p value <0.05).

Conclusion: Phenotypic tests remain reliable for the routine detection of ESBL in the absence of molecular methods. Rational use of instrumentation and antibiotics is advocated based on the risk factors detected from this study.

Keywords: Double disc synergy test; Epsilometer test; Extended spectrum beta lactamases.; Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR).