[Evaluation methods of clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine]

Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2023 Jun;48(12):3263-3268. doi: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20230219.502.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Clinical efficacy is the basis for the development of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM), and the evaluation of clinical efficacy of TCM has always been the focus of attention. The technical and methodological difficulties in the evaluation process often restrict the generation of high-level evidence. Therefore, methodological research should be deepened and innovative practice should be carried out to study the application of scientific research methods in the evaluation of the advantages of TCM. After more than ten years of development, the clinical efficacy evaluation of TCM, on the basis of the initially classic placebo randomized controlled trials, has successively carried out a series of meaningful attempts and explorations in N-of-1 trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, real world studies, narrative medicine studies, systematic evaluation, and other aspects, laying the foundation for the transformation of TCM from "experience" to "evidence". This paper focused on the clinical efficacy evaluation of TCM, summarized the main connotation and development status of efficacy evaluation indicators, standards, and methods, and put forward corresponding countermeasures and suggestions for the problems of indicator selection, standard formulation, and methodology optimization in the research process. It is clear that scientific and objective evaluation of the efficacy of TCM is an urgent problem to be solved at present.

Keywords: clinical research; evaluation of efficacy; methodology; traditional Chinese medicine.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Case-Control Studies
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Medicine, Chinese Traditional*
  • Narrative Medicine*
  • Treatment Outcome