A systematic review with meta-analysis on prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy versus standard dressing for obese women after caesarean section

Nurs Open. 2023 Sep;10(9):5999-6013. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1912. Epub 2023 Jun 26.

Abstract

Aims: The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in obese women undergoing caesarean section.

Design: An updated review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception up to March 2022 without restriction in language. We chose surgical site infection as the primary outcome.

Results: NPWT resulted in a lower surgical site infection rate compared with conventional dressing (risk ratio [RR] = 0.76). The infection rate after low transverse incision was lower comparing the NPWT group with the control group ([RR] = 0.76). No statistically significant difference was detected in blistering([RR] = 2.91). The trial sequential analysis did not support the 20% relative decrease in surgical site infection in the NPWT group. (type II error of 20%).

Keywords: caesarean section; meta-analysis; negative-pressure wound therapy; nursing care; obesity; randomized controlled trial.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review
  • Review
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Bandages
  • Blindness
  • Cesarean Section / adverse effects
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy* / methods
  • Obesity / complications
  • Obesity / therapy
  • Pregnancy
  • Surgical Wound Infection* / prevention & control
  • Wound Healing