Subcutaneous ICDs implantation following removal of normally functioning non-infected transvenous ICDs in two young patients

Abstract

In young patients with transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillations (TV-ICDs), the possibility of device infection or lead fracture would be high in their long lifetimes. Furthermore, the risk of lead removal will gradually increase over the years. We reported two cases of subcutaneous ICDs implantation following removal of TV-ICDs. Patient 1, 35-year-old man, underwent TV-ICD implantation 9 years ago for idiopathic ventricular fibrillation, and Patient 2, 46-year-old man, underwent TV-ICD implantation 8 years ago for asymptomatic Brugada syndrome. In both cases, the electrical performance was stable, and there was no incidence of arrythmia or no pacing demand during the follow-up duration. Considering future risk of device infection or lead fracture, and difficulty in future lead removal, TV-ICDs were removed with sufficient informed consent, and then, subcutaneous ICDs (S-ICDs) implantation were performed as an alternative to them. Although indication of the TV-ICD removal should be carefully considered in individual cases, long-term risks leaving it in place should be also considered in the management of young patient.

Learning objective: In young patient with TV-ICD, even for a normally functioning non-infected lead, S-ICD implantation following removal of the TV-ICD would represent a strategy associated with less long-term risks than leaving it in place.

Keywords: S-ICD; TV-ICD.