Cost analysis of an intrapartum quality improvement package for improving preterm survival and reinforcing best practices in Kenya and Uganda

PLoS One. 2023 Jun 23;18(6):e0287309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287309. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Introduction: Preterm birth is a leading cause of under-5 mortality, with the greatest burden in lower-resource settings. Strategies to improve preterm survival have been tested, but strategy costs are less understood. We estimate costs of a highly effective Preterm Birth Initiative (PTBi) intrapartum intervention package (data strengthening, WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist, simulation and team training, quality improvement collaboratives) and active control (data strengthening, Safe Childbirth Checklist).

Methods: In our analysis, we estimated costs incremental to current cost of intrapartum care (in 2020 $US) for the PTBi intervention package and active control in Kenya and Uganda. We costed the intervention package and control in two scenarios: 1) non-research implementation costs as observed in the PTBi study (Scenario 1, mix of public and private inputs), and 2) hypothetical costs for a model of implementation into Ministry of Health programming (Scenario 2, mostly public inputs). Using a healthcare system perspective, we employed micro-costing of personnel, supplies, physical space, and travel, including 3 sequential phases: program planning/adaptation (9 months); high-intensity implementation (15 months); lower-intensity maintenance (annual). One-way sensitivity analyses explored the effects of uncertainty in Scenario 2.

Results: Scenario 1 PTBi package total costs were $1.11M in Kenya ($48.13/birth) and $0.74M in Uganda ($17.19/birtth). Scenario 2 total costs were $0.86M in Kenya ($23.91/birth) and $0.28M in Uganda ($5.47/birth); annual maintenance phase costs per birth were $16.36 in Kenya and $3.47 in Uganda. In each scenario and country, personnel made up at least 72% of total PTBi package costs. Total Scenario 2 costs in Uganda were consistently one-third those of Kenya, largely driven by differences in facility delivery volume and personnel salaries.

Conclusions: If taken up and implemented, the PTBi package has the potential to save preterm lives, with potential steady-state (maintenance) costs that would be roughly 5-15% of total per-birth healthcare costs in Uganda and Kenya.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Health Care Costs
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Kenya
  • Premature Birth*
  • Quality Improvement
  • Uganda

Grants and funding

The PTBi study, including the cost analysis, was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The grant was received by Dr. Dilys Walker (DW, grant number OPP1107312; https://www.gatesfoundation.org/). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.