Rotavirus (RV) infection causes acute rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) in infants. Safe and effective RV vaccines are available, of which Mexico has included one in its national immunization program (NIP) since 2007. Health outcome gains, expressed in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and cost improvements are important additional factors for the selection of a NIP vaccine. These two factors were analyzed here for Mexico over one year implementing three RV vaccines: 2-dose Rotarix (HRV), versus 3-dose RotaTeq (HBRV), and 3-dose Rotasiil (BRV-PV), presented in a 1-dose or 2-dose vial). HRV would annually result in discounted QALY gains of 263 extra years compared with the other vaccines by averting an extra 24,022 homecare cases, 10,779 medical visits, 392 hospitalizations, and 12 deaths. From a payer's perspective and compared with HRV, BRV-PV 2-dose vial and BRV-PV 1-dose vial would annually result in $13,548,179 and $4,633,957 net savings, respectively, while HBRV would result in $3,403,309 extra costs. The societal perspective may also show savings compared with HRV for BRV-PV 2-dose vial of $4,875,860, while BRV-PV 1-dose vial and HBRV may show extra costs of $4,038,363 and $12,075,629 respectively. HRV and HBRV were both approved in Mexico, with HRV requiring less investment than HBRV with higher QALY gains and cost savings. The HRV vaccine produced those higher health gains due to its earlier protection and greater coverage achieved after its schedule completion with two doses only, providing full protection at four months of age instead of longer periods for the other vaccines.
Keywords: Acute rotavirus gastroenteritis; Mexico; cost-effectiveness; national immunization program; quality-adjusted life years; rotavirus; rotavirus vaccine.
Rotavirus (RV) infection causes acute diarrhea in infants and can be life-threatening. Several safe and effective vaccines against RV and its complications exist. For many governments choosing vaccines for national immunization programs, total costs or savings and health gains are important factors in the selection process. We compared the costs and health benefits of three RV vaccines for Mexico: HRV, HBRV, and BRV-PV, that have different dosing schedules: two doses for HRV and three doses for HBRV and BRV-PV. HRV is currently part of the national immunization program in Mexico. HRV would result in more health benefits as it incurs fewer RV-related cases, medical visits, hospitalizations, and infant deaths than the other vaccines due to its early protection achieved after only two doses to complete its schedule. However, from a payer’s perspective, the least expensive vaccine was BRV-PV, while HRV was less expensive than HBRV. From a societal perspective, also accounting for families’ costs and loss in income due to an infant’s RV disease, and the families’ costs and loss in income when accompanying the infant to the vaccination center, the HRV vaccine was less expensive than HBRV and BRV-PV presented in a 1-dose vial, while more expensive than BRV-PV presented in a 2-dose vial. HRV and HBRV are both approved in Mexico, although HBRV requires a greater investment at lower health benefits than HRV, from both a payer’s and a societal perspective. A 2-dose vaccination scheme is an important asset for the economic value of this vaccination program.