Effects of sacubitril-valsartan in patients undergoing maintenance dialysis

Ren Fail. 2023 Dec;45(1):2222841. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2222841.

Abstract

Objectives: Data on angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril-valsartan (SV) in patients undergoing maintenance dialysis is scarce. Our study aimed to investigate the effect of SV on patients undergoing dialysis.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of end-stage kidney disease (ESRD) patients undergoing either peritoneal dialysis (PD) or hemodialysis (HD) in our center. A total of 51 patients receiving SV treatment were enrolled in the SV group. Another 51 age and sex-matched patients on dialysis without SV treatment were selected as the control group. All the patients were regularly followed up in the dialysis clinic. Their clinical, biochemical, and echocardiographic parameters were all recorded at baseline and during follow-up. The effect and safety of SV were further analyzed.

Results: A total of 102 ESRD patients on dialysis (51 patients in the SV group and 51 patients in the control group) were finally enrolled. The median follow-up time was 349 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 217-535 days). The level of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) (median [IQR] before and after SV treatment: 596.35 pg/ml [190.6-1714.85] vs. 188.7 pg/ml [83.34-600.35], p < 0.001) or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (median [IQR]: 6316.00 pg/ml [4552.00-28598.00] vs. 5074.00 pg/ml [2229.00-9851.00], p = 0.022) were significantly decreased after treatment with SV. The variant rate of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly higher in the SV group compared to the control group, especially in the PD subgroup. No significant difference was found in other echocardiographic parameters between SV and control group. Subgroup analysis of the PD group showed an increase in daily PD ultrafiltration (median [IQR]: 400 ml/d [200-500] vs. 500 ml/d [200-850], p = 0.114) after SV treatment. Variant rate of overhydration (OH) measured by the body composition monitor (BCM) of the SV group were significantly different from the control group (median [IQR]: -13.13% [-42.85%-27.84%] vs. 0% [-17.95%-53.85%], p = 0.049). The rate of hyperkalemia was slightly higher but without significant difference before and after the introduction of SV (19.6% vs. 27.5%, p = 0.350). No event of hypotension and angioedema were observed.

Conclusions: SV might have a cardio-protective role in ESRD patients undergoing dialysis, especially in PD patients. Serum potassium should be monitored during the treatment.

Keywords: Sacubitril-valsartan; angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor; dialysis; end-stage renal disease.

MeSH terms

  • Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists / pharmacology
  • Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists / therapeutic use
  • Drug Combinations
  • Heart Failure* / drug therapy
  • Humans
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic* / chemically induced
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic* / complications
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic* / therapy
  • Natriuretic Peptide, Brain
  • Renal Dialysis
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stroke Volume
  • Tetrazoles / adverse effects
  • Valsartan / therapeutic use
  • Ventricular Function, Left

Substances

  • sacubitril and valsartan sodium hydrate drug combination
  • Natriuretic Peptide, Brain
  • Tetrazoles
  • Valsartan
  • Drug Combinations
  • Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists

Grants and funding

This study was supported by Peking University International Hospital Research Funds (No. YN2020QN01, No. YN2022QX01, and No. YN2020ZD03).