Patient and public involvement in cancer research: A scoping review

Sara Colomer-Lahiguera; Matthieu Steimer; Ursula Ellis; Manuela Eicher; Margaret Tompson; Tourane Corbière; Kristen R Haase

doi:10.1002/cam4.6200

Patient and public involvement in cancer research: A scoping review

Cancer Med. 2023 Jul;12(14):15530-15543. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6200. Epub 2023 Jun 16.

Authors

Sara Colomer-Lahiguera¹, Matthieu Steimer², Ursula Ellis³, Manuela Eicher¹, Margaret Tompson⁴, Tourane Corbière¹, Kristen R Haase⁵

Affiliations

¹ Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IUFRS), Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
² Master of Advanced Studies in Public Health student, Institute of Global Health, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.
³ Woodward Library, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
⁴ Saskatchewan, Canada.
⁵ School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Abstract

Introduction: Patient and public involvement (PPI) in research emphasizes the importance of doing research with, rather than for people with lived health/illness experience(s). The purpose of this scoping review is to investigate the breadth and depth of scientific literature on PPI in cancer research and to identify how is PPI applied and reported in cancer research.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycInfo up to March 2022. All titles/abstracts and full-text results were screened by two reviewers. Data were analyzed and are presented in both narrative and tabular format.

Results: We screened 22,009 titles/abstract, reviewed 375 full-text articles, of which 101 studies were included in this review. 66 papers applied PPI; 35 used co-design methodologies. PPI in cancer research in published research has increased steadily since 2015 and often includes those with a past diagnosis of cancer or relatives/informal caregivers. The most common applied methods were workshops or interviews. PPI was generally used at the level of consultation/advisor and occurred mainly in early stages of research. Costs related to PPI were mentioned in 25 papers and four papers described training provided for PPI.

Conclusions: Results of our review demonstrate the nature and extent of PPI expansion in cancer research. Researchers and research organizations entering the fray of PPI should consider planning and reporting elements such as the stage, level, and role type of PPI, as well as methods and strategies put in place to assure diversity. Furthermore, a thorough evaluation of whether all these elements meet the stated PPI purpose will help to grasp its impact on research outcomes.

Patient or public contribution: Two patients participated in the stakeholder consultation as part of the scoping review methodology, contributed to the discussion on refining the results, and critically reviewed the manuscript. Both are co-authors of this manuscript.

Keywords: PPI; cancer; patient and public involvement; research.

Publication types

Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

Caregivers
Humans
Neoplasms* / therapy
Patient Participation*
Research Design