Efficacy and cost-effectiveness analysis of pretreatment percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (GASTO 1059)

Abstract

Background: We launched a single-arm phase II study to determine the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) before concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods: Eligible patients received pretreatment PEG and enteral nutrition during CCRT. The primary outcome was the change of weight during CCRT. The secondary outcome included nutrition status, loco-regional objective response rate (ORR), loco-regional progression-free survival (LRFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities. A 3-state Markov model was applied for cost-effectiveness analysis. Eligible patients were matched and compared with those who had nasogastric tube feeding (NTF) or oral nutritional supplements (ONS).

Results: Sixty-three eligible patients received pretreatment PEG-based CCRT. The mean change of weight during CCRT was -1.4% (standard deviation, 4.4%), and after CCRT, 28.6% of patients gained weight and 98.4% had normal albumin levels. The loco-regional ORR and 1-year LRFS were 98.4% and 88.3%. The incidence of grade ≥3 esophagitis was 14.3%. After matching, another 63 patients were included in the NTF group and 63 in the ONS group. More patients gained weight after CCRT in the PEG group (p = 0.001). The PEG group showed higher loco-regional ORR (p = 0.036) and longer 1-year LRFS (p = 0.030). In cost analysis, the PEG group showed an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $3457.65 per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) compared with the ONS group with a probability of cost-effectiveness of 77.7% at the $10,000 per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold.

Conclusion: Pretreatment PEG is associated with better nutritional status and treatment outcome in ESCC patients treated with CCRT compared with ONS and NTF. Pretreatment of PEG can be cost-effective because of its significant clinical benefits.

Keywords: concurrent chemoradiotherapy; cost-effectiveness analysis; esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.