Shared decision-making in multiple sclerosis physical symptomatic care: a systematic review

Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2023 Jun 6:14:20406223231172920. doi: 10.1177/20406223231172920. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory, demyelinating, and neurodegenerative disease affecting young adults. People with MS are highly interested in engaging in physical symptom management and decision-making but are often not actively engaged in symptom management discussions. Research examining the benefit of shared decision-making in the management of physical MS symptoms is sparse.

Objectives: This study aimed to identify and synthesize the evidence on the use of shared decision-making in physical MS symptom management.

Design: This study is a systematic review of published evidence on the use of shared decision-making in physical MS symptom management.

Data sources and methods: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were searched in April 2021, June 2022, and April 2, 2023, for primary, peer-reviewed studies of shared decision-making in the management of MS physical symptoms. Citations were screened, data extracted, and study quality assessed according to Cochrane guidelines for systematic reviews, including risk of bias assessment. Statistical synthesis of the included study results was not appropriate; results were summarized in a nonstatistical manner using the vote-counting method to estimate beneficial versus harmful effects.

Results: Of 679 citations, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. Six studies addressed shared decision-making in the management of pain, spasms, neurogenic bladder, fatigue, gait disorder, and/or balance issues, and nine studies addressed physical symptoms in general. One study was a randomized controlled trial; most studies were observational studies. All study results and study author conclusions indicated that shared decision-making is important to the effective management of physical MS symptoms. No study results suggested that shared decision-making was harmful or delayed the management of physical MS symptoms.

Conclusion: Reported results consistently indicate that shared decision-making is important in effective MS symptomatic care. Further rigorous randomized controlled trials are warranted to investigate the effectiveness of shared decision-making associated with MS physical symptomatic care.

Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42023396270.

Keywords: MS; SDM; balance; fatigue; gait disorders; neurogenic bladder; pain; spasms.

Plain language summary

Shared decision-making among people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and their healthcare providers in the management of the physical symptoms of MS. Shared decision-making is suggested to be a key mechanism in promoting optimal symptomatic care related to Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Shared decision-making is mostly done and studied in relation to choosing therapies that may slow disease progression but not usually for symptomatic care. There are a few studies highlighting the effect of utilizing shared decision-making in symptomatic care of MS. We performed this study to identify all the published data about using shared decision-making in symptomatic care in MS to answer the research question: What is the evidence on shared decision-making in managing physical MS symptoms? We performed a systematic search for all the related published study results in four large literature databases. We found 15 studies on the use of shared decision-making in the management of MS-related symptoms. We synthesized the study results relating to the use of shared decision-making in symptomatic care of MS. The studies used several different designs and included a wide range of study rigor and quality. The results of our systematic review are: All the studies were consistent in their conclusions that shared decision-making is important for effective MS-related symptom management.Several studies found that symptomatic care is of the highest priority to people with MS, but not often a priority to their health care providers.The use of a shared decision-making model can promote discussion of symptoms in clinical consultations and align the goals of people with MS and their health care providers.Education of people with MS regarding their symptoms and available treatments will promote effective shared decision-making discussions. The available evidence supports that the use of shared decision-making is beneficial to the management of physical symptoms of MS. Further studies using a randomized controlled study design are required to establish the degree of benefit of utilizing shared decision-making associated with MS symptomatic care.

Publication types

  • Review