Background and objective: Ongoing seizure in the Emergency Department is a medical emergency and its aggressive management is essential. Prompt antiepileptic therapy with early cessation of seizure would minimize the morbidity and risk of recurrence. To compare time to seizure control with fosphenytoin to phenytoin protocol in the ED.
Materials and methods: We conducted an observational study on patients with active seizure in the Emergency Department comparing phenytoin versus fosphenytoin protocol over one year.
Results: During the study period, we recruited 121 patients in the phenytoin group and 124 patients in the fosphenytoin group. Generalized tonic-clonic seizure (73.5% in phenytoin vs. 68.5% in fosphenytoin arm) was the most common type of seizure in both the arms. The mean time taken for cessation of seizure in the fosphenytoin arm (17.48 ± 49.24) was less than half of that in the phenytoin arm (37.20 ± 58.17) (mean difference: 19.72, P = 0.004, 95% CI: -33.27 to -6.17). There was a significant decrease in recurrence rates of seizure with phenytoin compared to the fosphenytoin arm (17.7% vs. 31.4%: OR: 0.47, P = 0.013; 95% CI: 0.26-0.86). Favorable STESS (≤2) was higher with phenytoin compared to fosphenytoin (60.3% vs. 48.4%). The overall in-hospital mortality rate in both arms was negligible (0.8%).
Conclusion: The mean time for cessation of active seizure with fosphenytoin was less than half that of phenytoin. Despite its higher cost and minor adverse effects when compared to phenytoin, benefits seem to outweigh its limitation.
Keywords: Emergency Department; Fosphenytoin; epilepsy; phenytoin; status epilepticus.