Is three-point fixation needed to mechanically stabilize zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures?

Abstract

Fixation is critical in zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures to avoid malunion; however, controversy exists as to how much hardware is required to achieve adequate stability. Current fixation regimens may not represent the minimum stabilization needed for uneventful healing. Craniomaxillofacial (CMF) computational models have shown limited load transmission through the infraorbital rim (IOR), and a previous experimental study of ZMC fractures has suggested that IOR plating does not alter CMF bone strain patterns. This study aimed to measure the impact of stabilization on fracture site displacement under muscle loading, testing the hypothesis that three-point fixation is not critical for ZMC fracture stability. Four ZMC complex fractures were simulated on two cadaveric samples and stabilized with three-point plating. Displacements simulating mouth openings of 20 mm and 30 mm were applied to the mandible using a custom apparatus. Fracture gap displacement under load was measured at multiple points along each fracture line, and bone strain was captured using a combination of uniaxial and rosette gauges. Data capture was repeated with the IOR plate removed (two-point fixation) and with the zygomaticomaxillary plate removed (one-point fixation). Fracture displacement under muscle loading was consistent, with gaps of less than 1 mm in 95% of cases (range 0.05-1.44 mm), reflecting clinical stability. Large variabilities were observed in the strain measurements, which may reflect the complexity of CMFS load patterns and the sensitivity of strain values to gauge placement. This study supports the concept of hardware reduction, suggesting that two-point (or even one-point) fixation may provide sufficient stability for a ZMC fracture under applied muscle loading.

Keywords: Craniomaxillofacial; Experimental testing; Fracture displacement; Zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture fixation.