Inclusion of the workshop model in the standardized training of emergency medicine residents

Jin Ma; Qiang Wang; Xiaohua Xia; Zhiqiang Guo; Qiupeng Feng; Yan Zhou; Hua Yuan

doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15942

Inclusion of the workshop model in the standardized training of emergency medicine residents

Heliyon. 2023 Apr 29;9(5):e15942. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15942. eCollection 2023 May.

Authors

Jin Ma¹, Qiang Wang¹, Xiaohua Xia¹, Zhiqiang Guo¹, Qiupeng Feng¹, Yan Zhou¹, Hua Yuan¹

Affiliation

¹ Department of Emergency Medicine, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Kunshan 215300, PR China.

Abstract

Background: Standardized training of resident physicians (STRP) includes clinical practice, professional required courses, and public required courses, among others. Of them, clinical practice is the most important as it allows residents to implement what they have learned in theoretical education to practice. Clinical practice includes different teaching methods, such as traditional lectures, bedside teaching, and workshops, and each method has its advantages and disadvantages in different situations of interest. Emergency medicine (EM) focuses on the diagnosis and treatment of urgent medical conditions and entails several emergency procedures. In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of workshop-based STRP and traditional STRP on emergency physicians.

Methods: Overall, 125 residents who received STRP in EM between January and December 2021 were selected and randomly divided into two groups: the control group (n = 60; received traditional teaching) and the intervention group (n = 65; received workshop-based training). The theoretical performance, operative performance, and satisfaction of both groups were compared and analyzed.

Results: Regarding theoretical assessment, the scores of airway management, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and trauma management in the intervention group were 4.81 (t = 5.82, p < 0.001), 6.90 (t = 7.72, p < 0.001), and 5.25 (t = 6.14, p < 0.001), respectively. Regarding skill assessment, the scores for the same items in the intervention group were 4.43 (t = 5.30, p < 0.001), 4.55 (t = 5.61, p < 0.001), and 5.62 (t = 6.65, P < 0.001), respectively. Regarding satisfaction evaluation, the scores in the intervention group were 1.99 (t = 6.03, p < 0.001), 1.98 (t = 6.41, p < 0.001), and 1.96 (t = 6.14, p < 0.001), respectively. Overall, the scores were higher in the intervention group than in the control group.

Conclusion: The workshop training model effectively improves the theoretical knowledge and practical skills of EM residents undergoing standardized training. The residents found the training and its outcomes satisfactory, ultimately improving their emergency response and first-responder skills.

Keywords: Emergency medicine; Satisfaction; Standardized training of resident physicians; Teaching model; Workshop model.