Effect of a native bacterial consortium on growth, yield, and grain quality of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. subsp. durum) under different nitrogen rates in the Yaqui Valley, Mexico

Plant Signal Behav. 2023 Dec 31;18(1):2219837. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2023.2219837. Epub 2023 Jun 9.

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out to quantify the effect of a native bacterial inoculant on the growth, yield, and quality of the wheat crop, under different nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates in two agricultural seasons. Wheat was sown under field conditions at the Experimental Technology Transfer Center (CETT-910), as a representative wheat crop area from the Yaqui Valley, Sonora México. The experiment was conducted using different doses of nitrogen (0, 130, and 250 kg N ha-1) and a bacterial consortium (BC) (Bacillus subtilis TSO9, B. cabrialesii subsp. tritici TSO2T, B. subtilis TSO22, B. paralicheniformis TRQ65, and Priestia megaterium TRQ8). Results showed that the agricultural season affected chlorophyll content, spike size, grains per spike, protein content, and whole meal yellowness. The highest chlorophyll and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) values, as well as lower canopy temperature values, were observed in treatments under the application of 130 and 250 kg N ha-1 (the conventional Nitrogen dose). Wheat quality parameters such as yellow berry, protein content, Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-Sedimentation, and whole meal yellowness were affected by the N dose. Moreover, the application of the native bacterial consortium, under 130 kg N ha-1, resulted in a higher spike length and grain number per spike, which led to a higher yield (+1.0 ton ha-1 vs. un-inoculated treatment), without compromising the quality of grains. In conclusion, the use of this bacterial consortium has the potential to significantly enhance wheat growth, yield, and quality while reducing the nitrogen fertilizer application, thereby offering a promising agro-biotechnological alternative for improving wheat production.

Keywords: Bacterial inoculant; biofertilizer; durum wheat; nitrogen; soil restoration.

MeSH terms

  • Chlorophyll / metabolism
  • Edible Grain / metabolism
  • Fertilizers / analysis
  • Mexico
  • Nitrogen* / metabolism
  • Triticum* / metabolism

Substances

  • Nitrogen
  • Fertilizers
  • Chlorophyll

Grants and funding

This study was funded by CONACyT, project 253663, and project 257246, as well as by the PROFAPI project 2023_002. In addition, the authors acknowledge support by CONACyT for the Ph.D. scholarship CVU 479660 (Arlett L. Ibarra Villarreal). Enrico Arturo Yepez received support from COECYT-Sonora 20190430. Carlos Guzman gratefully acknowledges the European Social Fund and the Spanish State Research Agency (Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Universities) for financial funding through the Ramon y Cajal Program (RYC-2017-21891).