Explanatory model of the psychosocial variables related to the social acceptance of a uranium mine project in northwest Spain

Gonzalo Sánchez-Tabernero; Antonio R Hidalgo-Muñoz; José Ignacio Galán; Carmen Tabernero

doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1134499

Explanatory model of the psychosocial variables related to the social acceptance of a uranium mine project in northwest Spain

Front Psychol. 2023 May 23:14:1134499. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1134499. eCollection 2023.

Authors

Gonzalo Sánchez-Tabernero¹, Antonio R Hidalgo-Muñoz^{2

3}, José Ignacio Galán¹, Carmen Tabernero^{2

3}

Affiliations

¹ Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
² Faculty of Psychology, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
³ Instituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León (INCYL), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.

Abstract

Introduction: The demographic growth and the development of the welfare system have been accompanied by an important social dilemma between preserving nature or promoting energy development by assuming the benefits and risks of both proposals. This research attempts to address this social dilemma by analyzing the psychosocial factors that influence the acceptance or rejection of a new uranium mining development and exploitation project. The main objective was to test an explanatory theoretical model of uranium mining project acceptance, based on the interrelation of sociodemographic variables (e.g., age, gender, economic and educational situation, and level of knowledge about uranium energy) and cognitive variables (e.g., environmental beliefs, risk, and benefit perceptions), along with the activation of an emotional balance in response to the proposal of constructing a uranium mine.

Method: Three hundred seventy-one individuals responded to the questionnaire about the variables included in the model.

Results: The results showed that older participants showed lower levels of agreement with the mining proposal people, while women and those with greater knowledge of nuclear energy perceived greater risks and had a more negative emotional balance. The proposed explanatory model based on sociodemographic, cognitive, and affective variables showed good fit indices for explaining the assessment of the uranium mine. Thus, age, level of knowledge, risks and benefits, and emotional balance had a direct effect on the acceptance of the mine. Likewise, emotional balance showed a partial mediation effect between the relationships existing between the perception of benefits and risks and the acceptance of the mining proposal.

Discussion: The results are discussed based on the consideration of analyzing sociodemographic, cognitive, and affective variables to understand potential conflicts in communities affected by energy projects.

Keywords: acceptance or rejection; environmental beliefs; explanatory model; risk perception; social conflict; uranium mine.