Objective: Gliomas exhibit high intratumor and interpatient heterogeneity. Recently, it has been shown that the microenvironment and phenotype differ significantly between the glioma core (inner) and edge (infiltrating) regions. This proof-of-concept study differentiates metabolic signatures associated with these regions, with the potential for prognosis and targeted therapy that could improve surgical outcomes.
Methods: Paired glioma core and infiltrating edge samples were obtained from 27 patients after craniotomy. Liquid-liquid metabolite extraction was performed on the samples and metabolomic data were obtained via 2D liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry. To gauge the potential of metabolomics to identify clinically relevant predictors of survival from tumor core versus edge tissues, a boosted generalized linear machine learning model was used to predict metabolomic profiles associated with O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation.
Results: A panel of 66 (of 168) metabolites was found to significantly differ between glioma core and edge regions (p ≤ 0.05). Top metabolites with significantly different relative abundances included DL-alanine, creatine, cystathionine, nicotinamide, and D-pantothenic acid. Significant metabolic pathways identified by quantitative enrichment analysis included glycerophospholipid metabolism; butanoate metabolism; cysteine and methionine metabolism; glycine, serine, alanine, and threonine metabolism; purine metabolism; nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism; and pantothenate and coenzyme A biosynthesis. The machine learning model using 4 key metabolites each within core and edge tissue specimens predicted MGMT promoter methylation status, with AUROCEdge = 0.960 and AUROCCore = 0.941. Top metabolites associated with MGMT status in the core samples included hydroxyhexanoycarnitine, spermine, succinic anhydride, and pantothenic acid, and in the edge samples metabolites included 5-cytidine monophosphate, pantothenic acid, itaconic acid, and uridine.
Conclusions: Key metabolic differences are identified between core and edge tissue in glioma and, furthermore, demonstrate the potential for machine learning to provide insight into potential prognostic and therapeutic targets.
Keywords: MGMT promoter methylation; glioblastoma; glioma; machine learning; metabolomics; tumor core; tumor edge.