New urban habits in Stockholm following COVID-19

Urban Stud. 2023 Jun;60(8):1448-1464. doi: 10.1177/00420980211070677. Epub 2022 Feb 1.

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, physical distancing, mobility restrictions and self-isolation measures were implemented around the world as the primary intervention to prevent the virus from spreading. Urban life has undergone sweeping changes, with people using spaces in new ways. Stockholm is a particularly relevant case of this phenomenon since most facilities, such as day care centres and schools, have remained open, in contrast to cities with a broader lockdown. In this study, we use Twitter data and an online map survey to study how COVID-19 restrictions have impacted the use of different locations, services and amenities in Stockholm. First, we compare the spatial distribution of 87,000 geolocated tweets pre-COVID-19 and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Second, we analyse 895 survey responses asking people to identify places they 'still visit', 'use more', 'avoid' and self-report reasons for using locations. The survey provides a nuanced understanding of whether and how restrictions have affected people. Service and seclusion were found to be important; therefore, the accessibility of such amenities was analysed, demonstrating how changes in urban habits are related to conditions of the local environment. We find how different parts of the city show different capacities to accommodate new habits and mitigate the effects of restrictions on people's use of urban spaces. In addition to the immediate relevance to COVID-19, this paper thus contributes to understanding how restrictions on movement and gathering, in any situation, expose more profound urban challenges related to segregation and social inequality.

在新冠肺炎大流行期间,世界各地实施了保持社交距离、行动限制和自我隔离等措施,作为防止病毒传播的主要干预措施。城市生活发生了翻天覆地的变化,人们以新的方式使用空间。斯德哥尔摩是这种现象的一个特别相关的案例,因为大多数设施,如日托中心和学校,都保持了开放,与实施更广泛封锁措施的城市形成了鲜明对比。在本项研究中,我们使用推特数据和在线地图调查来研究新冠肺炎限制如何影响斯德哥尔摩不同地点、服务和便利设施的使用。首先,我们比较了新冠肺炎疫情之前和新冠肺炎大流行期间 87,000 条地理定位推文的空间分布。其次,我们分析了 895 份调查回复,这些调查要求人们确定他们“仍在访问”、“使用更多”、“回避”的各种地方,并自我报告使用相关地点的原因。该调查提供了对限制是否以及如何对人们产生影响的细致入微的理解。研究结果表明服务和隔离性很重要;因此,我们分析了此类便利设施的可及性,展示了城市习惯的变化与当地环境条件的关系。我们发现,在适应新的行为习惯、并减轻限制对人们使用城市空间的影响方面,城市的不同部分表现出不同的能力。因此,除了与新冠肺炎疫情的直接相关性之外,本文还有助于理解在任何情况下对行动和聚集的限制如何暴露与隔离和社会不平等相关的、更深刻的城市难题。.

Keywords: COVID-19; architecture; inequality; public space; segregation.